Posts
Ok, I admit, some of these things seem more like conspiracy theories than actual fact, but it is interesting to see their point of view and see if there is anything to this...
First off, Global Warming or Climate Change?
Next, 9/11, unanswered questions?
Then, Constitutional Integrity, where is the Birth Certificate?
I am just more interested in opinions of others about these issues, I am not spouting or supporting these as "gospel truth", just that they have an opposing view, one that may or may not have merit.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
I support Net Neutrality
I am sure you all have heard the term "Net Neutrality", it is
However, greed has taken its toll. Networks and Service Providers have found that they can gouge you for more money by limiting your access and charging you for kb or mb access rates.
???
Like we don't already worry about our finances.
It is good to see the Government finally standing behind something that "makes sense"...
"Preserving a Free and Open Internet: A Platform for Innovation, Opportunity, and Prosperity"
And I support FOSS for the same reason...
If you have a community behind the software, it will be stronger, faster, better, more secure...too bad Microsoft doesn't understand this.
Open Source for America: The New Government Accountability
is a principle proposed for residential broadband networks and potentially for all networks. A neutral broadband network is one that is free of restrictions on content, sites, or platforms, on the kinds of equipment that may be attached, and on the modes of communication allowed, as well as one where communication is not unreasonably degraded by other communication streams.I support it, because it is the way that companies ORIGINALLY DESIGNED the system, and the system can handle it. It is fair, it is reasonable, it is the way things started.
However, greed has taken its toll. Networks and Service Providers have found that they can gouge you for more money by limiting your access and charging you for kb or mb access rates.
???
Like we don't already worry about our finances.
It is good to see the Government finally standing behind something that "makes sense"...
"Preserving a Free and Open Internet: A Platform for Innovation, Opportunity, and Prosperity"
And I support FOSS for the same reason...
If you have a community behind the software, it will be stronger, faster, better, more secure...too bad Microsoft doesn't understand this.
Open Source for America: The New Government Accountability
Friday, October 23, 2009
Obama - right on track
With all his promises (broken), his "hope" (shattered), his plans (costly and ineffective), and the truth (bypassed), the American People are finally having their eyes opened.
Too bad they bought all the BS prior to the election...but some of us weren't fooled.
Barack Obama sees worst poll rating drop in 50 years
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Interesting.
Oh, and just because I love to cause trouble:
(Well, Mr. Former President, it seems that at least 53% of Americans just might miss you a little...)
P.S.
Don't get me wrong, Bush was terrible as president, and his policies would have landed us in the same situation we are in right now...but Obama is doing everything wrong, he isn't being a Democrat because he is using Republican (President Bush's) Strategies... or do I have that wrong? Was it Bush that wasn't being Republican because he was using a Democrat Congress' Strategies? And by extension, that is why Obama is failing, because it was the Democrat Strategy that was failing all this time?
Now there is an interesting question...
Too bad they bought all the BS prior to the election...but some of us weren't fooled.
Barack Obama sees worst poll rating drop in 50 years
Gallup recorded an average daily approval rating of 53 per cent for Mr Obama for the third quarter of the year, a sharp drop from the 62 per cent he recorded from April.And another source:
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 29% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as President. Thirty-eight percent (38%) Strongly Disapprove giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -9.You can see the trending here...
Interesting.
Oh, and just because I love to cause trouble:
(Well, Mr. Former President, it seems that at least 53% of Americans just might miss you a little...)
P.S.
Don't get me wrong, Bush was terrible as president, and his policies would have landed us in the same situation we are in right now...but Obama is doing everything wrong, he isn't being a Democrat because he is using Republican (President Bush's) Strategies... or do I have that wrong? Was it Bush that wasn't being Republican because he was using a Democrat Congress' Strategies? And by extension, that is why Obama is failing, because it was the Democrat Strategy that was failing all this time?
Now there is an interesting question...
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Democrats of a Different Color
I have an opinion on the "sliding scale" of the Political Spectrum. It used to be that Republicans were on the Right, Democrats on the Left and Moderates in the Middle. However, that is no longer the case.
If you have a CONTINUUM with Left, Right and Center, you have something that looks like this:
Now, the extreme is (on the Left) Socialism and Totalitarianism, and (on the Right) Anarchy.
The scale has been sliding for years, to a point we more resemble this:
For instance, "back in the day" the Democrats would propose a Socialist idea and the Republicans would come up with their own idea to solve the problem. Today, however, the Democrats propose a Socialist idea, and the Republicans come up with a "we aren't as socialist as they are" proposal. Just look at the whole Healthcare debate...
The interesting part, however, is the shift LEFT. That leaves the Moderates on the RIGHT of both the Left and the Right...
I am a Moderate, what I call a Constitutionalist. Traditionally, I have sat in the middle of the opposing forces, trying to keep balance. But this last little while, the shift in the spectrum, has caused me to be on the Right of either party.
So when I saw that the Democrats had a push for something new, I thought I would take a look. This is what I found:
the Blue Dog Coalition
If you have a CONTINUUM with Left, Right and Center, you have something that looks like this:
Now, the extreme is (on the Left) Socialism and Totalitarianism, and (on the Right) Anarchy.
The scale has been sliding for years, to a point we more resemble this:
For instance, "back in the day" the Democrats would propose a Socialist idea and the Republicans would come up with their own idea to solve the problem. Today, however, the Democrats propose a Socialist idea, and the Republicans come up with a "we aren't as socialist as they are" proposal. Just look at the whole Healthcare debate...
The interesting part, however, is the shift LEFT. That leaves the Moderates on the RIGHT of both the Left and the Right...
I am a Moderate, what I call a Constitutionalist. Traditionally, I have sat in the middle of the opposing forces, trying to keep balance. But this last little while, the shift in the spectrum, has caused me to be on the Right of either party.
So when I saw that the Democrats had a push for something new, I thought I would take a look. This is what I found:
the Blue Dog Coalition
The Blue Dogs are dedicated to a core set of beliefs that transcend partisan politics, including a deep commitment to the financial stability and national security of the United States.So refreshing to see some change...
Thursday, October 15, 2009
Experts Against Microsoft
Before, we were told, by the Computer Security Experts, to GET AWAY FROM Internet Explorer:
Experts Say To Switch Browsers In Light of IE Vulnerability
Now we are being told to use Linux (not Microsoft Windows) to avoid Bank Fraud:
Washington Post Says Use Linux To Avoid Bank Fraud
Then, we have Microsoft trying to destroy the destroy the competition by installing vulnerabilities...maybe they thought no one would notice?
Microsoft Update Slips In a Firefox Extension
This happened at the beginning of the year, and this is the Expert's response:
Microsoft Update Quietly Installs Firefox Extension
Sneaky Microsoft Add-on Put Firefox Users At Risk
Firefox Disables Microsoft .NET Addon
WAKE UP People!!!
What more do you need to make the switch from the MONOLITHIC MICROSOFT to a More Secure Platform?
If you need help making the switch, you know where to find me...I can help point you in the right direction.
(Oh, and as a side note, LINUX users don't have to worry about this:
Computer Virus Warning Could Actually Be Virus In Disguise
It seems that Symantec and other experts are advising extreme caution when using Windows, or switching to Linux to avoid these situations...)
<<>>
If you know the history behind Microsoft, most of the founders (Bill Gates, etc) worked for Xerox and IBM. They essentially stole the technology that made DOS and WINDOWS possible...ok, so "stole" is a strong word, but they took what they had done, and what they had learned, left Xerox in the lurch and started their own company.
Over the years, IBM and Microsoft have worked together on the Desktop Market, just like Intel and Microsoft have done. But with all the problems, security issues and other bugs in the Microsoft experience, IBM has officially announced they have something "faster, better, and stronger" than Microsoft's Windows products...not it isn't the Bionic Man's Brain...it is Ubuntu Linux...
<<>>
To give Microsoft another smack in the eye, it seems that some government agencies have had their fill of all the BS. Los Angeles is using some of the money from an Anti-Trust settlement against Microsoft, to MOVE AWAY from Microsoft...
GO LA!
Los Angeles Goes Google Apps with Microsoft Cash
<<>>
In Test, Windows 7 Vulnerable To 8 Out of 10 Viruses
Hmmm. So, the ads for Windows 7 being "more secure" and "safer" are what, LYING to us? Well, what do we expect form the worlds leader in half-assed software.
Here is the new headline for you:
"Linux Invulnerable to 10 out of 10 Viruses"
100% secure, 100% safe.
Experts Say To Switch Browsers In Light of IE Vulnerability
Now we are being told to use Linux (not Microsoft Windows) to avoid Bank Fraud:
Washington Post Says Use Linux To Avoid Bank Fraud
Then, we have Microsoft trying to destroy the destroy the competition by installing vulnerabilities...maybe they thought no one would notice?
Microsoft Update Slips In a Firefox Extension
This happened at the beginning of the year, and this is the Expert's response:
Microsoft Update Quietly Installs Firefox Extension
Apparently, the .NET update automatically installs its own Firefox add-on that is difficult -- if not dangerous -- to remove, once installed.And you might think that Microsoft learned from their first mistake, but here we are, at the end of the year, and we see it happen again:
Sneaky Microsoft Add-on Put Firefox Users At Risk
Firefox Disables Microsoft .NET Addon
the following addons have been known to cause stability or security issues with Firefox.
WAKE UP People!!!
What more do you need to make the switch from the MONOLITHIC MICROSOFT to a More Secure Platform?
If you need help making the switch, you know where to find me...I can help point you in the right direction.
(Oh, and as a side note, LINUX users don't have to worry about this:
Computer Virus Warning Could Actually Be Virus In Disguise
It seems that Symantec and other experts are advising extreme caution when using Windows, or switching to Linux to avoid these situations...)
<<
If you know the history behind Microsoft, most of the founders (Bill Gates, etc) worked for Xerox and IBM. They essentially stole the technology that made DOS and WINDOWS possible...ok, so "stole" is a strong word, but they took what they had done, and what they had learned, left Xerox in the lurch and started their own company.
Over the years, IBM and Microsoft have worked together on the Desktop Market, just like Intel and Microsoft have done. But with all the problems, security issues and other bugs in the Microsoft experience, IBM has officially announced they have something "faster, better, and stronger" than Microsoft's Windows products...not it isn't the Bionic Man's Brain...it is Ubuntu Linux...
<<
To give Microsoft another smack in the eye, it seems that some government agencies have had their fill of all the BS. Los Angeles is using some of the money from an Anti-Trust settlement against Microsoft, to MOVE AWAY from Microsoft...
GO LA!
Los Angeles Goes Google Apps with Microsoft Cash
<<
In Test, Windows 7 Vulnerable To 8 Out of 10 Viruses
Hmmm. So, the ads for Windows 7 being "more secure" and "safer" are what, LYING to us? Well, what do we expect form the worlds leader in half-assed software.
Here is the new headline for you:
"Linux Invulnerable to 10 out of 10 Viruses"
100% secure, 100% safe.
The arbitrary nature of Government Control
People are all hot to have the Government give some form of Healthcare. I have been warning of the dangers of this kind of a socialistic system, as have others.
No one seems to want to hear it...
Well, maybe you should read the news instead:
Social Security Makes It Official: No COLA In 2010
In other words, the Government can decide that they will increase, decrease, or discontinue service of their programs as they so desire.
In this case specifically, we are all under a financial crunch, food is more expensive, housing is ridiculous, and healthcare is astronomical ...
Yet the Government decides to NOT give a Cost Of Living Increase...this means that people are getting LESS this year than they got last year...
Yes, let the Government decide what is best for us, and we will make do with less every year, while they find new and more interesting ways to tax us and spend the money...on something else.
To make matters worse, it seems that the FBI can easily find its way around data collection restrictions, all they have to do is ask the State's DMV to do it for them.
And their new IAFIS database (Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System) will now contain DNA, 3-D Faces, Palm Prints, and Voice Prints.
So, if you have ever wondered if it was a bad idea to let the Government have control, well, now you know.
Our inaction, or our laziness has allowed the Government to take a small amount of control away from us. And once they have that little control, there is little, if any, regulation or oversight regarding that control.
In the Case of our Healthcare (or other social services), they can reduce benefits, reduce coverage, increase price (raise taxes) - all with impunity.
In the Case of our Freedoms, they can ignore their mandates, collect our data, track our movements, and tap our conversations...and there is nothing we can do about it.
Still think it is a good idea?
<<>>
And the HITS keep coming...
So, we not only give the Government total control over our money (Federal Reserve, Interest Rates, etc) but now we find it necessary to let them control our information:
Emergency Government Control of the Internet?
He who controls the information has all the power.
Is this really the position we want to put the Government in? I mean, after all, they have proven just how responsible they are, haven't they?
<<>>
We have heard it for years, "Social Security is going Bankrupt". But do we really understand what that means?
We pay into FICA for years and years, and we only take out at the end of our lives. Many people don't take the money out at all (death, etc) and not every penny is used...
This means that, at one time, there was a VERY LARGE amount of money in the Government Banks, gathering the Government's interest rate and backed by the Federal Reserve.
The Government couldn't leave it alone, so they decided it would be ok to borrow from it. This is when they decided it would be a good idea to use all the money for something else, and pay out only what they have to to keep people paid (or find ways to not pay them, and keep that money too).
This is the same game that MCI and ENRON played, and you see how the government reacted to THE CORPORATIONS... i.e. do as we say, not as we do. When the Government is above the law, there is no law.
It was this practice of borrowing that prompted legislation like the "lock box" legislation during the Bush administration, which amounted to a "feel good" legislation as it hasn't stopped the Government from taking that money for other uses.
So, we have a problem. There is no money in the Social Security bank, and soon, the "baby boomers" will outnumber the people paying into the fund, and the Government will cut services and reduce benefit. Watch, it will happen. Why? Because we saw fit to trust the Government with our money, and we already know that they don't know how to manage money (just look at the National Debt).
Would you trust your retirement to a Felon convicted of Securities Fraud? Then why would you trust your money to the Government?
To illustrate my point, here are the latest woes facing YOU because of YOUR Government's mismanagement of YOUR money...
Social Security and Medicare finances worsen
Flashforward to today...
Why are we willing to let these same fiscally irresponsible people handle our Medical (beyond Medicare and Medicaid (social Security programs))? Have we learned NOTHING from our Social Security experience?
No one seems to want to hear it...
Well, maybe you should read the news instead:
Social Security Makes It Official: No COLA In 2010
In other words, the Government can decide that they will increase, decrease, or discontinue service of their programs as they so desire.
In this case specifically, we are all under a financial crunch, food is more expensive, housing is ridiculous, and healthcare is astronomical ...
Yet the Government decides to NOT give a Cost Of Living Increase...this means that people are getting LESS this year than they got last year...
Yes, let the Government decide what is best for us, and we will make do with less every year, while they find new and more interesting ways to tax us and spend the money...on something else.
To make matters worse, it seems that the FBI can easily find its way around data collection restrictions, all they have to do is ask the State's DMV to do it for them.
And their new IAFIS database (Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System) will now contain DNA, 3-D Faces, Palm Prints, and Voice Prints.
So, if you have ever wondered if it was a bad idea to let the Government have control, well, now you know.
Our inaction, or our laziness has allowed the Government to take a small amount of control away from us. And once they have that little control, there is little, if any, regulation or oversight regarding that control.
In the Case of our Healthcare (or other social services), they can reduce benefits, reduce coverage, increase price (raise taxes) - all with impunity.
In the Case of our Freedoms, they can ignore their mandates, collect our data, track our movements, and tap our conversations...and there is nothing we can do about it.
Still think it is a good idea?
<<
And the HITS keep coming...
So, we not only give the Government total control over our money (Federal Reserve, Interest Rates, etc) but now we find it necessary to let them control our information:
Emergency Government Control of the Internet?
He who controls the information has all the power.
Is this really the position we want to put the Government in? I mean, after all, they have proven just how responsible they are, haven't they?
<<
We have heard it for years, "Social Security is going Bankrupt". But do we really understand what that means?
We pay into FICA for years and years, and we only take out at the end of our lives. Many people don't take the money out at all (death, etc) and not every penny is used...
This means that, at one time, there was a VERY LARGE amount of money in the Government Banks, gathering the Government's interest rate and backed by the Federal Reserve.
The Government couldn't leave it alone, so they decided it would be ok to borrow from it. This is when they decided it would be a good idea to use all the money for something else, and pay out only what they have to to keep people paid (or find ways to not pay them, and keep that money too).
This is the same game that MCI and ENRON played, and you see how the government reacted to THE CORPORATIONS... i.e. do as we say, not as we do. When the Government is above the law, there is no law.
It was this practice of borrowing that prompted legislation like the "lock box" legislation during the Bush administration, which amounted to a "feel good" legislation as it hasn't stopped the Government from taking that money for other uses.
So, we have a problem. There is no money in the Social Security bank, and soon, the "baby boomers" will outnumber the people paying into the fund, and the Government will cut services and reduce benefit. Watch, it will happen. Why? Because we saw fit to trust the Government with our money, and we already know that they don't know how to manage money (just look at the National Debt).
Would you trust your retirement to a Felon convicted of Securities Fraud? Then why would you trust your money to the Government?
To illustrate my point, here are the latest woes facing YOU because of YOUR Government's mismanagement of YOUR money...
Social Security and Medicare finances worsen
Flashforward to today...
Why are we willing to let these same fiscally irresponsible people handle our Medical (beyond Medicare and Medicaid (social Security programs))? Have we learned NOTHING from our Social Security experience?
Friday, October 09, 2009
April 1st comes early
I was minding my own business when I saw a news article "Barack Obama Wins the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize".
After I cleaned the Diet Dr. Pepper off my keyboard, monitor and desk, and waited for the pain from the carbonation in my sinuses to subside, I had to ask myself, "FOR WHAT?!?!"
After all, he has been in office for 10 months, and in that time, he has sent more troops into a war that isn't ours, he hasn't withdrawn our troops from Iraq, he has nearly started another cold war with Korea and Iran, and just look at the state of our country...it is ANYTHING but peaceful around here...
Well, wait a minute... what is it that they say about "good intentions"?
There is another article that is looking at the reactions of people to this news:
Reaction: Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize
Where one of the individuals, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, said:
Then the DNC gets involved and calls all the Republicans "Terrorists"...
SOUNDS LIKE A WINNING PEACE STRATEGY TO ME! Don't like people's opinions, and the GOOD POINTS they have for why Obama shouldn't have won, or at least SHOULD have turned down the award...then call them Terrorists... yup, Nobel Material!
If you want to read what "normal" people are saying, look here:
Your Take » Will the Prize Lead to an Obama Backlash?
and over at SlashDot.org
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "BBC", for the full article search BBC's web site or Google with the title of this article)
After I cleaned the Diet Dr. Pepper off my keyboard, monitor and desk, and waited for the pain from the carbonation in my sinuses to subside, I had to ask myself, "FOR WHAT?!?!"
After all, he has been in office for 10 months, and in that time, he has sent more troops into a war that isn't ours, he hasn't withdrawn our troops from Iraq, he has nearly started another cold war with Korea and Iran, and just look at the state of our country...it is ANYTHING but peaceful around here...
the Nobel Peace Prize ... committee is honoring his intentions more than his achievements.Um... Holy Hera! You can get a Nobel Peace Prize for your "INTENTIONS"?
Well, wait a minute... what is it that they say about "good intentions"?
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.Well, I guess we must be in Hell at the moment...excuse me while I get my travel papers...
[1855 H. G. Bohn Hand-Book of Proverbs 514]
There is another article that is looking at the reactions of people to this news:
Reaction: Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize
Where one of the individuals, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele, said:
"The real question Americans are asking is, 'What has President Obama actually accomplished?' It is unfortunate that the president's star power has outshined tireless advocates who have made real achievements working towards peace and human rights. One thing is certain - President Obama won't be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action."I'm not even a Republican, and I have to agree with this statement...
Then the DNC gets involved and calls all the Republicans "Terrorists"...
SOUNDS LIKE A WINNING PEACE STRATEGY TO ME! Don't like people's opinions, and the GOOD POINTS they have for why Obama shouldn't have won, or at least SHOULD have turned down the award...then call them Terrorists... yup, Nobel Material!
If you want to read what "normal" people are saying, look here:
Your Take » Will the Prize Lead to an Obama Backlash?
and over at SlashDot.org
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "BBC", for the full article search BBC's web site or Google with the title of this article)
The perils of pornography...
For the past several years the LDS Church (among others) has been warning people about the dangers of pornography. Experts have shown links between pornography and marital problems, infidelity, sex crimes, and in general, the moral decline of our society.
Like many "evils", this one cannot stay stagnate. I mean, you wouldn't think it is a problem for our young people to get addicted to pornography, and it isn't, not with the internet and all...but for a company to say...
This is what I have to say about the plan of Playboy to put a picture of Marge Simpson on the cover (and inside) their monthly magazine.
My son is 14 years old. One of his favorite cartoons/tv shows is "The Simpsons". Now, are they targeting 20 year olds, or 14 year olds?
I think the answer is obvious.
Marge Simpson on Playboy Cover
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Associated Press", for the full article search The Associated Press' web site or Google with the title of this article)
Like many "evils", this one cannot stay stagnate. I mean, you wouldn't think it is a problem for our young people to get addicted to pornography, and it isn't, not with the internet and all...but for a company to say...
...the idea is to attract readers in their 20s to a magazine where the average reader's age is 35.Is, at best, just a cover for the real agenda.
This is what I have to say about the plan of Playboy to put a picture of Marge Simpson on the cover (and inside) their monthly magazine.
My son is 14 years old. One of his favorite cartoons/tv shows is "The Simpsons". Now, are they targeting 20 year olds, or 14 year olds?
I think the answer is obvious.
Marge Simpson on Playboy Cover
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Associated Press", for the full article search The Associated Press' web site or Google with the title of this article)
The EVILS of DMCA
There have been a lot of stories about the DMCA being used to harass people, bully people, and create what is essentially a Legal form of Censorship.
Boing-Boing, bless their collective souls, are showing one such company that there are those of us who won't be bullied.
First off, take a look at this advertisement:
Then think about what is wrong with the picture...
Would ANYONE really WANT to look like this? (YUCK!)
But Ralf Lauren thinks this is "good advertising"...
Anyway, when people criticize Mr. Ralf, he gets his panties in a knot, and starts threattening...so here is what Boing-Boing had to say:
Oh, and just in case you are wondering, this is what the model looks like in a "normal" RL ad:
And this is what she looks like in Real Life (without being touched up):
The criticism that Ralph Lauren doesn't want you to see!
(These images are provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "Ralf Lauren", for the full information search Ralf Lauren's web site)
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "Boing-Boing and Happy Mutants LLC", for the full article search Boing-Boing's web site or Google with the title of this article)
(not to mention that it is so hard to follow the DMCA that most people just DO NOT DO IT...this includes the people that make the stupid laws...
French President Violates His Own Copyright Law, Again)
Boing-Boing, bless their collective souls, are showing one such company that there are those of us who won't be bullied.
First off, take a look at this advertisement:
Then think about what is wrong with the picture...
Would ANYONE really WANT to look like this? (YUCK!)
But Ralf Lauren thinks this is "good advertising"...
Anyway, when people criticize Mr. Ralf, he gets his panties in a knot, and starts threattening...so here is what Boing-Boing had to say:
So, to Ralph Lauren, GreenbergTraurig, and PRL Holdings, Inc: sue and be damned. Copyright law doesn't give you the right to threaten your critics for pointing out the problems with your offerings.
Oh, and just in case you are wondering, this is what the model looks like in a "normal" RL ad:
And this is what she looks like in Real Life (without being touched up):
The criticism that Ralph Lauren doesn't want you to see!
(These images are provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "Ralf Lauren", for the full information search Ralf Lauren's web site)
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "Boing-Boing and Happy Mutants LLC", for the full article search Boing-Boing's web site or Google with the title of this article)
(not to mention that it is so hard to follow the DMCA that most people just DO NOT DO IT...this includes the people that make the stupid laws...
French President Violates His Own Copyright Law, Again)
Why Try Linux?
Why install LINUX on your computer?
With the recession hitting us all hard, and computers having become part of our daily life, we sometimes wonder how to get our daily fix of Internet and Email, without going hungry...
One thing we can do is Move To Linux...
#1 - Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Suse, etc - are Free, unlike Windows which can range in price from $84 (XP Home) to $189 (Vista Business). A Linux disk will only cost you ONE CD or DVD.
#2 - Linux comes PACKED with all the software you need.
#4 - The Linux user community can provide better trouble-shooting and support (FOR FREE) than you would ever get from Microsoft (for $29 an hour), unless you enjoy talking with some guy in Bangladesh who can't even speak English. There are even local communities like "Ogden Area Linux User Group" (OLAUG), "Salt Lake Linux User Group" (SLLUG), and etc. Come on out and see!
#5 - If you need special software, you don't have to be locked into a ONE vendor solution, there are MANY open-source alternatives to just about ANY software need that you need (or want)...many are FREE. Or, you can develop it yourself, or modify something "in house" and get specialized software that does exactly what you want, for the cost of a developer.
#6 - If you are tired of Malware, Spyware, Ad-Ware, Pop-Ups, Viruses, and all manner of annoyances on your computer, and you want a more secure method of holding onto your electronic data,
-AND-
#7 - If you want a stable, useable computer, if you are tired of the "blue screen of death", if you really hate having to re-boot your machine every few days...
Then maybe it is time to think about changing your operating system to something that really works.
If you do install Linux, you will notice that some things are different. The only thing I can do is give you is a little advice:
#1 - DON'T PANIC. If it is good enough for the Hichhiker's Guide, it is good enough for me.
You have, by now, noticed that things are a little different...different is good! Poke around, play with it. You cannot hurt it. Just be aware, if it asks for a password, be sure you really want to do whatever it is that is asking for a password.
#2 - Use It. Open the different programs, get familiar with them. It is nearly IMPOSSIBLE for you to "damage" the system by doing something "wrong", so play around, take it out for a spin, have fun!
#3 - Get Involved. The Linux Community on the web is very large, and you might not even know how large it is around your community.
For those a little more technically inclined, who whould like to know how Linux is different (or the same) as Windows, here is a stab at the Linux File System compared to Windows
<<>>
LINUX is even great for the Windows Power User, the conversion is cheep and easy:
Desktop Linux For The Windows Power User
Google Desktop for Linux
<<>>
There are several people who have gone "cold turkey" and left Windows behind in favor of Ubuntu Linux (or other flavors of linux), Keith Tokash is one such individual. He has a list of the Necessary and Desired programs that you need for Ubuntu (linux) to be happy, it is worth a read!
<<>>
This is an article that describes what your PC (Windows Based) can become if you get "hacked" or a virus, or mall ware or spy ware or ad ware... Windows PCs are extremely susceptible to these types of programs, and you have to spend lots of money to fix the security holes, without any guarantee of a true fix.
The Scrap Value of a Hacked PC
Linux compartmentalizes the user experience, so your PC is protected by at least 2 passwords, and none of the programs are interconnected, so if one user profile gets infected, another one can be perfectly free from infection.
Here is another take on Linux:
Linux for housewives. XP for geeks.
And with Schools ALWAYS strapped for cash, they cannot afford new hardware, which Windows requires. Their solution is simple, save money on both ends:
Ubuntu breathes new life into school's abandoned hardware
<<>>
Open Source and Microsoft Free
If this guy can move over to Linux, and survive, ANYONE can. The nice thing is, he gives a lot of good advice and tools for the transition.
With the recession hitting us all hard, and computers having become part of our daily life, we sometimes wonder how to get our daily fix of Internet and Email, without going hungry...
One thing we can do is Move To Linux...
#1 - Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Suse, etc - are Free, unlike Windows which can range in price from $84 (XP Home) to $189 (Vista Business). A Linux disk will only cost you ONE CD or DVD.
#2 - Linux comes PACKED with all the software you need.
OpenOffice (this is compatible with Microsoft Office and it contains all the same types of programs; a spreadsheet, word processor, presentation creator, etc.)#3 - Linux is EASY to use. If you can use Microsoft Windows, you can use Linux. Linux is compatible with MOST hardware (and more hardware configurations than Windows...no more upgrading your computer hardware just to upgrade your computer's software), and it works on LOTS of OLD hardware. Why upgrade your whole machine at the cost of several HUNDRED dollars to run Vista or Windows 7 when you can continue running your hardware for several more years WITHOUT sacrificing speed or functionality?
Games (there are more games for Linux users than Solitaire, Mine Sweeper, and Internet Hearts)
Productivity Software, Educational Software, Entertainment Software...all FREE...
#4 - The Linux user community can provide better trouble-shooting and support (FOR FREE) than you would ever get from Microsoft (for $29 an hour), unless you enjoy talking with some guy in Bangladesh who can't even speak English. There are even local communities like "Ogden Area Linux User Group" (OLAUG), "Salt Lake Linux User Group" (SLLUG), and etc. Come on out and see!
#5 - If you need special software, you don't have to be locked into a ONE vendor solution, there are MANY open-source alternatives to just about ANY software need that you need (or want)...many are FREE. Or, you can develop it yourself, or modify something "in house" and get specialized software that does exactly what you want, for the cost of a developer.
#6 - If you are tired of Malware, Spyware, Ad-Ware, Pop-Ups, Viruses, and all manner of annoyances on your computer, and you want a more secure method of holding onto your electronic data,
-AND-
#7 - If you want a stable, useable computer, if you are tired of the "blue screen of death", if you really hate having to re-boot your machine every few days...
Then maybe it is time to think about changing your operating system to something that really works.
If you do install Linux, you will notice that some things are different. The only thing I can do is give you is a little advice:
#1 - DON'T PANIC. If it is good enough for the Hichhiker's Guide, it is good enough for me.
You have, by now, noticed that things are a little different...different is good! Poke around, play with it. You cannot hurt it. Just be aware, if it asks for a password, be sure you really want to do whatever it is that is asking for a password.
#2 - Use It. Open the different programs, get familiar with them. It is nearly IMPOSSIBLE for you to "damage" the system by doing something "wrong", so play around, take it out for a spin, have fun!
#3 - Get Involved. The Linux Community on the web is very large, and you might not even know how large it is around your community.
* Provo Linux Users Group (PLUG) - http://plug.org/#4 - These references are your support line for when you have questions. Or if you prefer LIVE support, you can use IRC (chat rooms on the web), you can link to the "Freenode" network (http://www.freenode.net) and you will have access to many LINUX related "channels" where you can chat LIVE with people who are familiar with the system, and can provide help for you.
* Utah Valley Linux Users Group (UVLUG) - http://uvlug.org/
* Salt Lake Linux Users Group (SLLUG) - http://www.sllug.org/
* Ogden Area Linux User Group (OALUG) - http://www.oalug.com/
* Southern Utah Unix Users Group (SU3G) - http://www.su3g.org/
* USU Free Software and Linux Club (USU FSLC) - http://fslc.usu.edu/
* BYU Unix Users Group (BYU UUG) - http://uug.byu.edu/
* Greater Utah BSD Users Group (GUBUG) - http://gubug.org/
* Ubuntu Utah - http://utah.ubuntu-us.org/
* http://www.linuxmigration.com/
* http://www.linuxjournal.com/
* http://www.linuxquestions.org/
* http://www.linux.org/lessons/beginner/index.html
* http://www.linux.org/lessons/beginner/l1/lesson1a.html
* http://www.tldp.org/
* http://www.ubuntu.com/
* http://www.ubuntuforums.com/
For those a little more technically inclined, who whould like to know how Linux is different (or the same) as Windows, here is a stab at the Linux File System compared to Windows
/ = Root of the OS. (like C:\)Some of the other great things you can do with Linux:
/bin = Binary executables for the operating system itself. (like C:\Windows)
/boot = The kernel. (like C:\Windows)
/etc = Configuration files. (like C:\Windows)
/home = File spaces for individual users other than root. (like C:\Documents and Settings)
/proc = A special-purpose folder for some system processes
/sbin = Binaries that various system "users" execute.
/tmp = Temporary files. (like C:\temp)
/usr = Program files. (like C:\Windows)
/var = Variable-content files and folders.
swap = This is "virtual memory." (like the Windows swap "file")
Chat Program = Pigeon, similar to Trillian (all chat programs in one box)
Internet = Firefox, Opera, and others. You can even install Microsoft IE...
Graphics = Gimp gives you a ton of flexibility for playing with pictures
USB Compatibility = Most Cameras, Media Players, etc, work with Linux
Music and DVD = Linux has both Music and DVD players, burners and rippers
Games = Several of the Big Name companies make games for Linux, others are compatible via a helper program "CrossOver Linux" by CodeWeavers
Office = You have access to World Class software from Open Office: Writer, Spreadsheet, Presentations, etc.
<<
LINUX is even great for the Windows Power User, the conversion is cheep and easy:
Desktop Linux For The Windows Power User
Google Desktop for Linux
<<
There are several people who have gone "cold turkey" and left Windows behind in favor of Ubuntu Linux (or other flavors of linux), Keith Tokash is one such individual. He has a list of the Necessary and Desired programs that you need for Ubuntu (linux) to be happy, it is worth a read!
<<
This is an article that describes what your PC (Windows Based) can become if you get "hacked" or a virus, or mall ware or spy ware or ad ware... Windows PCs are extremely susceptible to these types of programs, and you have to spend lots of money to fix the security holes, without any guarantee of a true fix.
The Scrap Value of a Hacked PC
Linux compartmentalizes the user experience, so your PC is protected by at least 2 passwords, and none of the programs are interconnected, so if one user profile gets infected, another one can be perfectly free from infection.
Here is another take on Linux:
Linux for housewives. XP for geeks.
And with Schools ALWAYS strapped for cash, they cannot afford new hardware, which Windows requires. Their solution is simple, save money on both ends:
Ubuntu breathes new life into school's abandoned hardware
<<
Open Source and Microsoft Free
If this guy can move over to Linux, and survive, ANYONE can. The nice thing is, he gives a lot of good advice and tools for the transition.
Thursday, October 08, 2009
Cash for Clunkers = FAIL
Ok, I said it a while back...
All the Cash for Clunkers did was give people who had money more money. Most people affected by the recession don't have the extra money to buy a new car, they are spending that money on FOOD or HEALTHCARE...or trying to make it between unemployment checks...
Those NOT affected by the recession (or not affected as much) still had enough money to go out and buy cars, so they got rewarded with an extra $4500...
Everyone complained about the Bush Stimulus programs and how they gave money back to the rich...well, um, Bush didn't come up with the "Cash For Clunkers" program...
In fact, the experts and the critics or the Cash for Clunkers program were correct, it was a Bad Idea...
Clunkers in Practice
All the Cash for Clunkers did was give people who had money more money. Most people affected by the recession don't have the extra money to buy a new car, they are spending that money on FOOD or HEALTHCARE...or trying to make it between unemployment checks...
Those NOT affected by the recession (or not affected as much) still had enough money to go out and buy cars, so they got rewarded with an extra $4500...
Everyone complained about the Bush Stimulus programs and how they gave money back to the rich...well, um, Bush didn't come up with the "Cash For Clunkers" program...
In fact, the experts and the critics or the Cash for Clunkers program were correct, it was a Bad Idea...
Clunkers in Practice
Swine Flu or Swine Medical
We are seeing a LOT of information come in about the whole Swine Flue (H1N1) thing...it is interesting that so many are just taking the Government at their word. Sorry, but you must earn my trust, and the Government has done ANYTHING but earn my trust. There are several things that concern me about this Swine Flue thing...
#1 = Swine Flue, while not a very pleasant experience, is responsible for a fraction of the total deaths by Influenza every year. THOUSANDS of people die from Influenza, only a few hundred have died from Swine Flue...
#2 = If the discrepancy between the death rate is so great, WHY is H1N1 an "epidemic" and Influenza just a "seasonal thing"?
#3 = They originally told us that the vaccine would be much later, then it came early, they then said there would be shortages, now they have enough for everyone... With the "shortages" for the Influenza vaccine a few years ago, HOW is it POSSIBLE to have such a dramatic change for a previously unknown "epidemic"?
#4 = Ok, so maybe I am paranoid...but have you ever read Tom Clancy's "Rainbow Six"? If not, read it...
Or have you seen the movie "V for Vendetta"? If not, see it...
#5 = I really don't like the whole "Government involvement in my healthcare" thing...especially since the Government cannot run any program without major problems and issues, waste and fraud, and they have no reason to care about any one individual...especially with Big (Medical) Corporations feeding politicians money...
Now, I also must comment about something in this article:
Another web site says:
See, waste and fraud...still in the system!
Then we have to wonder about the other side effects, and possible other problems...
In one article, we read:
You might also find these videos interesting, as they go through the actual information of what H1N1 is and just how bad it is...
Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Blaylock On Vaccines
Swine Flu Vaccine: When?
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "WebMD, LLC", for the full article search WebMD, LLC's web site or Google with the title of this article)
First swine flu vaccinations — but most must wait
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Associated Press", for the full article search The Associated Press' web site or Google with the title of this article)
Swine flu shots stir concern among pregnant women
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Buffalo News", for the full article search The Buffalo News' web site or Google with the title of this article)
Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "Mercola.com, Dr. Mercola", for the full article search Mercola.com's web site or Google with the title of this article)
<<>>
Even after all the assurances, after spending all that money, after telling everyone everything will be ok...they are now saying that there will be a shortage of the H1N1 vaccine...
Gee, I never would have guessed the government would be less than truthful...
Nationwide Shortage In Supply of Swine Flu Vaccine
<<>>
I have to revise this, now, there are LOTS of news articles about how only "those at risk" are getting the vaccine, and how there are now shortages.
One has to wonder, is it the MEDIA that is screwing up the information or is it the Government not being truthful. Either scenario is plausible.
And
Further articles are now saying that the "surplus" is now a "shortage":
H1N1 Vaccine Shortage in Utah?
<<>>
Here are some more informative links for this topic:
Investigation: Swine Flu Numbers Inflated
Swine Flu Seizures
Swine Flu: The Risks and Efficacy of Vaccines
<<>>
Vaccine Surplus
Of course there is a SURPLUS now... all the "rush" is over, the bulk of the people who will get H1N1 have gotten it, the rest is all down hill from here. The Government bought every American Citizen a dose of Vaccine, but now those that have had the virus will not need it, so, yes, there is a surplus of the vaccine, and a deficit in wasted money to pay for something all those people who had H1N1 won't need.
Talk about poor planning, waste and fraud...and we want to give them MORE health related responsibility?
#1 = Swine Flue, while not a very pleasant experience, is responsible for a fraction of the total deaths by Influenza every year. THOUSANDS of people die from Influenza, only a few hundred have died from Swine Flue...
#2 = If the discrepancy between the death rate is so great, WHY is H1N1 an "epidemic" and Influenza just a "seasonal thing"?
#3 = They originally told us that the vaccine would be much later, then it came early, they then said there would be shortages, now they have enough for everyone... With the "shortages" for the Influenza vaccine a few years ago, HOW is it POSSIBLE to have such a dramatic change for a previously unknown "epidemic"?
#4 = Ok, so maybe I am paranoid...but have you ever read Tom Clancy's "Rainbow Six"? If not, read it...
Or have you seen the movie "V for Vendetta"? If not, see it...
#5 = I really don't like the whole "Government involvement in my healthcare" thing...especially since the Government cannot run any program without major problems and issues, waste and fraud, and they have no reason to care about any one individual...especially with Big (Medical) Corporations feeding politicians money...
Now, I also must comment about something in this article:
Swine Flu Vaccine: When?, July 21, 2009It says:
The U.S. government has spent $1.15 billion to buy enough vaccine to immunize the entire U.S. population against the new flu.That works out to about $3.74 per person in the USA.
Another web site says:
The H1N1 vaccine itself is free because the government bought it with your tax dollars. But providers can charge a fee for administering it, usually about $20. Regular flu shots tend to cost up to $35.Last year, when I stood in line to get my flu shot, it took 30 seconds, and we went through about 10 people in 7 or 8 minutes. That is about 90 people an hour...times that by $20 each, you get $1800 an hour... MAN DO I WANT THAT JOB...!!!
See, waste and fraud...still in the system!
Then we have to wonder about the other side effects, and possible other problems...
In one article, we read:
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta has acknowledged that the swine flu vaccine has not been thoroughly tested on pregnant women and children.Yet in another article:
Q: Who's first in line?And another question is raised about one of the ingredients of the Vaccine, Squalene.
A: Pregnant women; the young, ages 6 months through 24 years; people younger than 64 who have conditions such as asthma or diabetes that increase the risk of complications from flu; health workers and caregivers of newborns.
Your immune system recognizes squalene as an oil molecule native to your body. It is found throughout your nervous system and brain. In fact, you can consume squalene in olive oil and not only will your immune system recognize it, you will also reap the benefits of its antioxidant properties.Was this information given to people taking the vaccine? Shouldn't a potential health risk be revealed?
The difference between “good” and “bad” squalene is the route by which it enters your body. Injection is an abnormal route of entry which incites your immune system to attack all the squalene in your body, not just the vaccine adjuvant.
Your immune system will attempt to destroy the molecule wherever it finds it, including in places where it occurs naturally, and where it is vital to the health of your nervous system.
You might also find these videos interesting, as they go through the actual information of what H1N1 is and just how bad it is...
Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Blaylock On Vaccines
Swine Flu Vaccine: When?
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "WebMD, LLC", for the full article search WebMD, LLC's web site or Google with the title of this article)
First swine flu vaccinations — but most must wait
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Associated Press", for the full article search The Associated Press' web site or Google with the title of this article)
Swine flu shots stir concern among pregnant women
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Buffalo News", for the full article search The Buffalo News' web site or Google with the title of this article)
Squalene: The Swine Flu Vaccine’s Dirty Little Secret Exposed
(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "Mercola.com, Dr. Mercola", for the full article search Mercola.com's web site or Google with the title of this article)
<<
Even after all the assurances, after spending all that money, after telling everyone everything will be ok...they are now saying that there will be a shortage of the H1N1 vaccine...
Gee, I never would have guessed the government would be less than truthful...
Nationwide Shortage In Supply of Swine Flu Vaccine
<<
I have to revise this, now, there are LOTS of news articles about how only "those at risk" are getting the vaccine, and how there are now shortages.
One has to wonder, is it the MEDIA that is screwing up the information or is it the Government not being truthful. Either scenario is plausible.
And
Further articles are now saying that the "surplus" is now a "shortage":
H1N1 Vaccine Shortage in Utah?
<<
Here are some more informative links for this topic:
Investigation: Swine Flu Numbers Inflated
Swine Flu Seizures
Swine Flu: The Risks and Efficacy of Vaccines
<<
Vaccine Surplus
Of course there is a SURPLUS now... all the "rush" is over, the bulk of the people who will get H1N1 have gotten it, the rest is all down hill from here. The Government bought every American Citizen a dose of Vaccine, but now those that have had the virus will not need it, so, yes, there is a surplus of the vaccine, and a deficit in wasted money to pay for something all those people who had H1N1 won't need.
Talk about poor planning, waste and fraud...and we want to give them MORE health related responsibility?
The Folly of Real ID
Real ID is doomed to failure. Every reason they have given for adopting it is meaningless. The whole idea is spreading to other aspects of ID and security, like Passports, Credit Cards, and more...
This is more than just a little scary.
Especially when someone can build an effective RFID reader out of about $200 in parts from Radio Shack
Passport RFIDs cloned wholesale by $250 eBay auction spree
And There are other security concerns with RFID too...
Security? Information Safety? The experts are saying that these criminals are now able to "remote mug" people...take their identity, without touching them, and they have no idea they have been a victim of a crime, until the bills roll in...
This is what happens when you leave someone else in charge of YOUR protection...when YOU fail to take responsibility for yourself...
This is more than just a little scary.
Criminals to 'adapt to ID cards'(This Excerpt is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "BBC News", for the full article search CBBC News' web site or Google with the title of this article)
By Jonathan Amos
BBC News science reporter, Dublin
ID cards promise a more secure form of technology
The UK government's proposed ID scheme will do little to stop identity theft and may actually exacerbate fraudulent behaviour in its early years.
That is the view of researcher Dr Emily Finch who interviews career criminals about their activities.
She has detailed how they adapt their strategies to get around new anti-crime technologies such as chip and pin.
Dr Finch will tell a Dublin conference that these criminals will be undaunted by the prospect of identity cards.
...
Especially when someone can build an effective RFID reader out of about $200 in parts from Radio Shack
Passport RFIDs cloned wholesale by $250 eBay auction spree
And There are other security concerns with RFID too...
Security? Information Safety? The experts are saying that these criminals are now able to "remote mug" people...take their identity, without touching them, and they have no idea they have been a victim of a crime, until the bills roll in...
This is what happens when you leave someone else in charge of YOUR protection...when YOU fail to take responsibility for yourself...
Wednesday, October 07, 2009
Civility : a thing of the past
We, "The People", used to be civilized. I put it in the past tense, because I want you all to understand something...we are no longer Civilized.
The Princeton WordNet defines "civility" as, "formal or perfunctory politeness" or "politeness: the act of showing regard for others".
My reasoning?
If you have to ask the Government to make laws to enforce CIVIL behavior, then we are no longer Civilized.
It used to be that people acted with Respect, Honor, Integrity, Dignity, and Honesty. Now, we have to jockey for our position on the highway, we have to watch our belongings, we have to rely on the LAW to make people behave, to make people be civil...or punish them if they don't.
Whatever happened to self control...to doing the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do?
The LDS have had to respond to behavior, ON THEIR PROPERTY, that shouldn't have happened. It isn't that it "just shouldn't have happened on private property" but it "shouldn't have happened at all *IN PUBLIC*"... Some public displays of affection are NOT civilized behavior. We expect animals to act "natural" in public, but people are supposed to be restrained, they are supposed to be civilized, or at least THOUGHTFUL enough of other people to not act certain ways IN PUBLIC.
Now, we look at the some people's response to the LDS. If people were CIVILIZED, they would respect the right of the land owners. If people had self control, if they exercised personal responsibility, they would act (in public) in a dignified manner. Instead, we have all kinds of people acting selfish, they trample the land owner's wishes and rights, and they show no respect for others in our society. Then they get upset when the landowner must change policy to MAKE PEOPLE *have*, or at least, *show* Respect.
This isn't "civilized" behavior! Being "forced to be civilized" is not the same as "being civilized".
We have gone backwards in our society. We don't take responsibility for our actions, we expect the LAW to force us to "obey" and then we can point fingers and blame the LAW for being too harsh, or being wrong, or trampling on our rights...
Only, it is our uncivilized behavior that has forced the LAW to work in that way...
We wouldn't need the LAW to FORCE us to do ANYTHING, if we exercised a little civility.
I would love to see us all go back to the days when people were Civilized. Where they acted appropriately in public, where they respected other people; days where being honest, having integrity, and showing courtesy was the NORM, not the EXCEPTION.
I would never act, on your front lawn or in your home like some people act on the LDS Church's property, or in PUBLIC...I have enough respect for you to "behave myself" to show a little restraint, to be Civilized...
I wish more people had that respect too. If more people were civilized, we might be able to reduce the complexity and invasiveness of the law...maybe crime would go down for once...maybe road rage and assault would become a thing of the past...
That only requires that we become "CIVILIZED"...
The Princeton WordNet defines "civility" as, "formal or perfunctory politeness" or "politeness: the act of showing regard for others".
My reasoning?
If you have to ask the Government to make laws to enforce CIVIL behavior, then we are no longer Civilized.
It used to be that people acted with Respect, Honor, Integrity, Dignity, and Honesty. Now, we have to jockey for our position on the highway, we have to watch our belongings, we have to rely on the LAW to make people behave, to make people be civil...or punish them if they don't.
Whatever happened to self control...to doing the right thing, just because it is the right thing to do?
The LDS have had to respond to behavior, ON THEIR PROPERTY, that shouldn't have happened. It isn't that it "just shouldn't have happened on private property" but it "shouldn't have happened at all *IN PUBLIC*"... Some public displays of affection are NOT civilized behavior. We expect animals to act "natural" in public, but people are supposed to be restrained, they are supposed to be civilized, or at least THOUGHTFUL enough of other people to not act certain ways IN PUBLIC.
Now, we look at the some people's response to the LDS. If people were CIVILIZED, they would respect the right of the land owners. If people had self control, if they exercised personal responsibility, they would act (in public) in a dignified manner. Instead, we have all kinds of people acting selfish, they trample the land owner's wishes and rights, and they show no respect for others in our society. Then they get upset when the landowner must change policy to MAKE PEOPLE *have*, or at least, *show* Respect.
This isn't "civilized" behavior! Being "forced to be civilized" is not the same as "being civilized".
We have gone backwards in our society. We don't take responsibility for our actions, we expect the LAW to force us to "obey" and then we can point fingers and blame the LAW for being too harsh, or being wrong, or trampling on our rights...
Only, it is our uncivilized behavior that has forced the LAW to work in that way...
We wouldn't need the LAW to FORCE us to do ANYTHING, if we exercised a little civility.
I would love to see us all go back to the days when people were Civilized. Where they acted appropriately in public, where they respected other people; days where being honest, having integrity, and showing courtesy was the NORM, not the EXCEPTION.
I would never act, on your front lawn or in your home like some people act on the LDS Church's property, or in PUBLIC...I have enough respect for you to "behave myself" to show a little restraint, to be Civilized...
I wish more people had that respect too. If more people were civilized, we might be able to reduce the complexity and invasiveness of the law...maybe crime would go down for once...maybe road rage and assault would become a thing of the past...
That only requires that we become "CIVILIZED"...
Tuesday, October 06, 2009
Are you looking for a UNIQUE house?
Actually, I would be, if I could afford it...
But here are some interesting ideas, if you ever want to build a new home, or start a 5-Star "underground" hotel...
You can build a home like a Hobbit
I am actually going to price something like this out... with the savings on insulation and having a super cheep building material (cement and dirt) this might be the way to go...
You can build a 5-Star Underground Hotel
I have had this idea for a while...they have a Trident Missile Base with 3 missile shafts and several underground stories, all connected by tunnels...
It would be very interesting to build in rooms and a restaurant, maybe a swimming pool...all underground...preserving history, and doing something unique...
The Grounds would include a landing pad (maybe a small air strip...) and a golf course, and other amenities (tennis, swimming, horseback riding, etc)
Now, if I could just rummage up a few million to start the project...
But here are some interesting ideas, if you ever want to build a new home, or start a 5-Star "underground" hotel...
You can build a home like a Hobbit
I am actually going to price something like this out... with the savings on insulation and having a super cheep building material (cement and dirt) this might be the way to go...
You can build a 5-Star Underground Hotel
I have had this idea for a while...they have a Trident Missile Base with 3 missile shafts and several underground stories, all connected by tunnels...
It would be very interesting to build in rooms and a restaurant, maybe a swimming pool...all underground...preserving history, and doing something unique...
The Grounds would include a landing pad (maybe a small air strip...) and a golf course, and other amenities (tennis, swimming, horseback riding, etc)
Now, if I could just rummage up a few million to start the project...
Monday, October 05, 2009
Visual Representation of Ben Franklin's Quote
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
--Benjamin Franklin
This is often quoted as a stand against the "Nanny State" or "Big Brother"...but the problem is, you have to understand or believe that there is such a thing first...
But I found a nice representation, a cartoon, if you will...that shows what Benjamin was talking about...
Something I think you should notice...
#1 - there is NO GATE in the fence, no way in and no way out
#2 - they are cutting it down, not just removing the side walls
#3 - the workers are "government", the occupants are "citizens"
#4 - the occupants are not trying to stop the government
#5 - the government is not asking permission of the occupants
Don't we keep farm animals in a similar situation? Or PRISONERS?
I know this article is about the Canadian Government, but in all reality, they are only being influenced by what we do here in America...
If their government is willing to lie to them about important issues, isn't our government going to be the one setting that example?
(This image is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Christian Science Monitor", for the full information search The Christian Science Monitor's web site)
--Benjamin Franklin
This is often quoted as a stand against the "Nanny State" or "Big Brother"...but the problem is, you have to understand or believe that there is such a thing first...
But I found a nice representation, a cartoon, if you will...that shows what Benjamin was talking about...
Something I think you should notice...
#1 - there is NO GATE in the fence, no way in and no way out
#2 - they are cutting it down, not just removing the side walls
#3 - the workers are "government", the occupants are "citizens"
#4 - the occupants are not trying to stop the government
#5 - the government is not asking permission of the occupants
Don't we keep farm animals in a similar situation? Or PRISONERS?
I know this article is about the Canadian Government, but in all reality, they are only being influenced by what we do here in America...
If their government is willing to lie to them about important issues, isn't our government going to be the one setting that example?
(This image is provided for informational, educational, and discussion purposes only. It is Copyright "The Christian Science Monitor", for the full information search The Christian Science Monitor's web site)
Saturday, October 03, 2009
Loosing Jobs
There are a couple things that are important to talk about when we start talking job loss numbers...
First off, everyone likes to blame this silly recession on Bush. I don't think so...
It has been pointed out, time and time again, that it is CONGRESS that spends the Money, and for 6 of the 8 years that Bush was in office, he had a Democrat Controlled Congress.
So, who's fault is this? Well, we could still blame Bush, or we could start to look at where the issues really stemmed from...
Next, if we start looking we find that there is LOTS of dis-information going around...some of this goes back as far as 2002, when the Democrat Congress took hold of our Country...
These numbers talk about how many jobs have been lost due to certain Bush policies...
Well, how about we stop listening to rumors, and look at what is really going on...
FIRST off, the Democrats have been in Control since 2002
SECOND, When we elected a Democrat, Obama, the unemployment rate, you know, the one thing Obama said would be fixed by his Stimulus scams, is at an all time high, 9.8%...
Is Despair Deflating Unemployment Numbers?
“Real Unemployment” at 16%? Color Me Skeptical
So now, what do you think? Is this something we have been lied to about, or do you think everything is "OK"?
First off, everyone likes to blame this silly recession on Bush. I don't think so...
It has been pointed out, time and time again, that it is CONGRESS that spends the Money, and for 6 of the 8 years that Bush was in office, he had a Democrat Controlled Congress.
So, who's fault is this? Well, we could still blame Bush, or we could start to look at where the issues really stemmed from...
Next, if we start looking we find that there is LOTS of dis-information going around...some of this goes back as far as 2002, when the Democrat Congress took hold of our Country...
These numbers talk about how many jobs have been lost due to certain Bush policies...
Well, how about we stop listening to rumors, and look at what is really going on...
FIRST off, the Democrats have been in Control since 2002
SECOND, When we elected a Democrat, Obama, the unemployment rate, you know, the one thing Obama said would be fixed by his Stimulus scams, is at an all time high, 9.8%...
Is Despair Deflating Unemployment Numbers?
“Real Unemployment” at 16%? Color Me Skeptical
So now, what do you think? Is this something we have been lied to about, or do you think everything is "OK"?
Friday, October 02, 2009
Real ID --> Time to get REAL
The whole Idea of Real ID is disturbing. We already have a Driver's License, Passport, and Social Security Number...these are all ways to Identify us...
So why do we need "yet another" form of ID? It won't make our lives easier, it won't reduce complication...
So maybe these States have the right idea...I know they have both the right, power and authority, but I also believe they have the right idea...
6 states defy law requiring ID cards
Utah Opposes Real ID Act!
REAL ID Act
So why do we need "yet another" form of ID? It won't make our lives easier, it won't reduce complication...
So maybe these States have the right idea...I know they have both the right, power and authority, but I also believe they have the right idea...
6 states defy law requiring ID cards
Utah Opposes Real ID Act!
REAL ID Act
Thursday, October 01, 2009
Judicial Mismanagement
In any court case involving a Jury, it is up to the Jury to decide the fate of the accused, or in civil case, if someone is at fault and what their award for damages should be.
The Prosecution/Plaintiff/Defense/Defendant MUST make their case, they must argue and "school" the jury to understanding. If they fail to make their case, or help the Jury understand, they can loose, or the wrong people can win a case.
There should be no way that a Judge can vacate a ruling by a jury and use the excuse,
If the Jury "lacked" something, it was the fault of the actors in the court, and the Jury's standing should hold...if someone fails to do their job, it isn't for the Judge to change the ruling. He might be able to seek a retrial based on some legal aspect, but vacating a judgement because he doesn't think the Jury understood? What if the Jury understood and the Judge did not?
Hmmm, something smells fishy... if I were the defendants, I would ask for an investigation into this issue, into this judge.
$338M Patent Ruling Against Microsoft Overturned
The Prosecution/Plaintiff/Defense/Defendant MUST make their case, they must argue and "school" the jury to understanding. If they fail to make their case, or help the Jury understand, they can loose, or the wrong people can win a case.
There should be no way that a Judge can vacate a ruling by a jury and use the excuse,
the jury 'lacked a grasp of the issues before it and reached a finding without a legally sufficient basis'
If the Jury "lacked" something, it was the fault of the actors in the court, and the Jury's standing should hold...if someone fails to do their job, it isn't for the Judge to change the ruling. He might be able to seek a retrial based on some legal aspect, but vacating a judgement because he doesn't think the Jury understood? What if the Jury understood and the Judge did not?
Hmmm, something smells fishy... if I were the defendants, I would ask for an investigation into this issue, into this judge.
$338M Patent Ruling Against Microsoft Overturned
Perfection vs. Reality
I don't normally read the Deseret News, but I saw an article that caught my attention, and when done reading that article, I saw a link to a blog, where the question is asked, "Are models on magazine covers a public health hazard?"
Having 2 daughters, one is 8 the other is 12, I have some concerns myself...
This also reminded me of a TV Show that my wife and I watch on Mondays, it is called "Castle".
In the First Season's Finale, there is a scene where they go over some of the issues of Modern Girls and their "Body Issues".
In the Scene, Rick Castle has taken his daughter to find a dress for Prom. His daughter, Alexa, a 15 year old High School student, is trying on (what appears to be "yet another dress") a dress and asks her father, "What do you think?", to which he replies, "It looks fine...". His daughters expression changes and she says "just fine?".
This is where it gets interesting, as Castle's mother comes in and tells Alexa, "Its Hideous!" and Alexa responds, "Thank you!" and turns to go try the dress her grandmother, Martha, had brought her to try.
Then Castle turns to his mom and says something to the effect of, "WHat are you trying to do, give her Body Issues!?" To which Martha responds, “Nothing you can say will change how we feel. What men don’t understand is: the right clothes, the right shoes, the right makeup… it hides the flaws we think we have. They make us look beautiful to ourselves… that’s what makes us look beautiful to others.”
Thoughtfully, Castle responds, "I remember it wasn't that long ago that all she needed to feel beautiful was a plastic tierra and a pink tutu." And Martha's final comment is, "And we spend the rest of our lives trying to feel that way again..."
Then Alexa emerges from the dressing room, wearing something my child will never wear, and everyone is happy.
(Much of the above is paraphrased, but done the best I could from memory...)
The point here is, women, girls especially, feel there is something wrong with their body. I don't understand it, really...but I do understand it has something to do with our society. It used to be that girls that were a little "heavy" (not talking obese here, just a "few extra pounds") were considered by many men to be VERY ATTRACTIVE. I am one such person. I don't think super models, or most any in show business, are really "attractive", I find many of them "repulsive" especially after they have all kinds of "body modification" like "breast augmentation"... or even photoshop re-touching... it just isn't "natural" and isn't attractive (to me).
So if our society is causing the problem, and the problem stems from our Fashion Magazines, TV Shows, Movies...etc...then maybe we should give some thought to including a warning about how some (not all) pictures are re-touched to show "perfection" instead of "reality"...
Having 2 daughters, one is 8 the other is 12, I have some concerns myself...
This also reminded me of a TV Show that my wife and I watch on Mondays, it is called "Castle".
In the First Season's Finale, there is a scene where they go over some of the issues of Modern Girls and their "Body Issues".
In the Scene, Rick Castle has taken his daughter to find a dress for Prom. His daughter, Alexa, a 15 year old High School student, is trying on (what appears to be "yet another dress") a dress and asks her father, "What do you think?", to which he replies, "It looks fine...". His daughters expression changes and she says "just fine?".
This is where it gets interesting, as Castle's mother comes in and tells Alexa, "Its Hideous!" and Alexa responds, "Thank you!" and turns to go try the dress her grandmother, Martha, had brought her to try.
Then Castle turns to his mom and says something to the effect of, "WHat are you trying to do, give her Body Issues!?" To which Martha responds, “Nothing you can say will change how we feel. What men don’t understand is: the right clothes, the right shoes, the right makeup… it hides the flaws we think we have. They make us look beautiful to ourselves… that’s what makes us look beautiful to others.”
Thoughtfully, Castle responds, "I remember it wasn't that long ago that all she needed to feel beautiful was a plastic tierra and a pink tutu." And Martha's final comment is, "And we spend the rest of our lives trying to feel that way again..."
Then Alexa emerges from the dressing room, wearing something my child will never wear, and everyone is happy.
(Much of the above is paraphrased, but done the best I could from memory...)
The point here is, women, girls especially, feel there is something wrong with their body. I don't understand it, really...but I do understand it has something to do with our society. It used to be that girls that were a little "heavy" (not talking obese here, just a "few extra pounds") were considered by many men to be VERY ATTRACTIVE. I am one such person. I don't think super models, or most any in show business, are really "attractive", I find many of them "repulsive" especially after they have all kinds of "body modification" like "breast augmentation"... or even photoshop re-touching... it just isn't "natural" and isn't attractive (to me).
So if our society is causing the problem, and the problem stems from our Fashion Magazines, TV Shows, Movies...etc...then maybe we should give some thought to including a warning about how some (not all) pictures are re-touched to show "perfection" instead of "reality"...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)